Double Helix Double Helix Opinion Series

Einstein’s faith and ours

Albert Einstein in his office at the University of Berlin in 1920. Photo courtesy of Creative Commons

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RNS) Kurt Vonnegut believed that Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, as an intellectual contribution for the benefit of humanity, could be compellingly paired with another compact formula as radical and revolutionary as any scientific discovery.

Also the product of Jewish thought, it comes from the peasant-artisan Jesus of Nazareth, and it goes like this: “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.”

Hold up, we might think to ourselves. This is dangerous territory. Let us not praise imaginative men by forsaking that bright red line between the sacred and the secular. We’ve had enough of that already, especially now.

Actors Johnny Flynn, left, and Geoffrey Rush star as Albert Einstein at different ages in National Geographic’s “Genius.” Photo courtesy of National Geographic/Dusan Martincek

When any and all research can be contemptuously waved away with the smear of “political correctness” and every verifiable fact can be beaten back with talk of “media bias,” we’ve got to fight for the right to make certain distinctions. The centuries-old battle is on: We have to protect the sanity of science from the madness of religion. With denialism on the march in Washington, let’s please leave our lonely genius Albert out of it. Why risk tarring him with talk of faith? Einstein delivers us from dogma. He wanted nothing to do with it.

True enough. And were the history of religion the sad tale of countless souls submitting sadly to the reigning dogmas of their times and places, the question would be settled. Einstein was in no way religious. He was, in fact, religion’s opposite. But what if his own witness is a model for thinking these matters through more carefully?

Consider one of Einstein’s most essential sayings: “A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth.” Consider how hard-won this insight remained throughout his life. Anyone who’s been accused of not being “a team player” can relate. Imagine the young student finding it increasingly difficult to accept as fact the presumed existence of ether as the substance through which starlight travels.

Albert Einstein with his wife Elsa in an undated image. Photo courtesy of Creative Commons/LOC/Underwood and Underwood, New York

Rejection of received wisdom (or that which passes for wisdom) doesn’t generally go unchecked. Then as now, the pressures of friends, family, and alleged educators often insist that not accepting certain concepts “on authority” is a sign of an intellectual incapacity at best or a willful refusal to get with the program at worst. For those of us who imagine creative nonconformity is essential to the evolution of any and all souls, Einstein goes before us as a kind of saint, the geek boy who lived.

Even the most cursory examination of any sacred tradition reminds us that this is how religion works. The heretic now is the saint later. Father Abraham left behind the rituals of Ur. Siddhartha Gautama fled the pleasure palaces of his upbringing. The Prophet Muhammad said no to the Meccan status quo.

And like every imaginative pioneer of the human barnyard, Einstein refused to accept received knowledge as settled. He was righteously skeptical of that which passed for incontrovertible fact. When he decreed, as he did, that nationalism is an infantile disease (the measles of humankind), it wasn’t a renunciation of every attachment or any and all forms of allegiance. It was the denunciation, then and now, of a death-dealing idol.

As a German who lost his country to fascism, he knew all too well what a murderous misunderstanding of self and others can do to a culture and the globe in which it nests. By his lights, right realization of mystery — the miracle of cosmos and consciousness —serves as a summons to humility and awe in our consideration of other people. The imperatives of neighborliness, Einstein helped us to see, must be taken up globally. While this position isn’t unique to any sacred tradition exclusively, it’s enough to render Einstein an at least occasional prophet within most.

Actor Geoffrey Rush stars as Albert Einstein in National Geographic’s “Genius.” Photo courtesy of National Geographic

The animating awe we associate with Einstein came from his lifelong consideration of invisible forces. This isn’t to sneak God in by way of metaphysics, but to note, with Einstein, that so much — maybe most — of what’s out there remains invisible to us on the human scale. The poet Emily Dickinson made a similar observation when she said that what we call supernatural is, in one sense, only the natural we have yet to see or to even try to explain. To be agnostic, from this angle, is to simply know that you don’t know.

Einstein’s faith seems to have borne a deep resemblance to that of one of his heroes, Baruch Spinoza, the 17th-century Jewish philosopher and lens-grinder who was famously unwilling to credit a definitive distinction between God and nature. When it comes to seemingly ultimate questions that won’t submit to proofs, both men viewed relentless humility as the only posture befitting good faith. Einstein was known to accept, from those who chose to affix it, the label of agnostic, but he bristled at the thought of being pushy about it: “I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being.”

Similarly, Spinoza himself argued that the best place to land, if land we must, on these questions of faith is wherever it is we need to land in order to fortify ourselves in walking humbly and loving mercy and actively seeking the welfare of our neighbor. Dogma we will always have with us, I can imagine Einstein saying, but the dogma that denies the fact of deep relationship — the relativity within which we live and move and have our being — we can and must do without. It’s as if, for Einstein, anything we might call sin is, at its core, a denial of the fact of relationship. A deeper awareness of relationship, meanwhile, can overcome estrangement at any time.

Or as that other famously sweatered figure of the 20th century, Fred Rogers, once observed, “We are all intimately related. May we never pretend that we are not.” Like Rogers, Einstein invites us to lean into the mysterious fact of others and all that remains unfathomable in our shared existence. We can be inspired by complexity instead of fearing it. In a world where the powerful often deal in conversation-stoppers, shutting down honest inquiry as a threat and freethinking as a danger, Einstein starts the conversation up again and again with the alternative ethic — the better faith — of a curiosity without borders. May his tribe increase.

(David Dark is an author and a religion professor at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn. He wrote this commentary to coincide with “Genius,” the National Geographic series on Einstein that premieres on Tuesday (April 25))

A DNA strand next to the title of the series.

These stories are part of a series on science and religion, brought to you with support from the John Templeton Foundation. Opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. (RNS logo, John Templeton Foundation logo}

About the author

David Dark

14 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • Men like Newton, Einstein and Hawking to name a few have always intrigued me. I can’t really relate to the intelligence required to understand the math of things unseen, but I can relate to the curiosity of things unseen. I can relate also with a belief, and what it is like to sometimes struggle with what can be produced with a greater faith in that belief.
    Einstein had a belief in his theory of general relativity, but it predicted black holes. Einstein could not work out the actual existence of black holes in his mind however. According to National Geographic March, 2014 he was not alone. “In the first half of the twentieth century most physicists dismissed the idea that an object could become dense enough to asphyxiate light. To lend it any more credence than one would give the tooth fairy was to risk career suicide.” For myself, belief, faith, and the unseen, would be different than general relativity, faith in it, and black holes. But the life it leads to, the kind of questions it raises are the same. For Einstein the questioning of his theory and the prediction of black holes caused him to question his faith in what he believed. Had he been able to hang around longer he would have seen what the testing of his belief produced. Questioning and testing is good science, what is tested becomes stronger science. In the Christian religion according to the first chapter of James, this kind of testing always will produce something. It is interesting what can actually be observed in science and religion.

  • Judaism is a relativistic faith where there is no central authority (such as a Pope or bishop) or required statement of belief (such as a 10 things must believe). Instead, people look at the texts and traditions and come to their own conclusions, thus it is not surprising that Einstein famously wrote in The New York Times about his belief in a “cosmic religious feeling.” What is that? That’s up to each of us to define. See: http://www.endlesssearch.co.uk/science_cosmicreligion.htm

  • Hold up, we might think to ourselves. This is dangerous territory. Let
    us not praise imaginative men by forsaking that bright red line between
    the sacred and the secular. We’ve had enough of that already, especially
    now.”

    Einstein’s faith in God is unmistakable–he just came at the God-thing very differently! That’s totally in synch with the fact that he came at everything else very differently! Einstein recognized no “bright red lne between the sacred and the secular,” and I’m glad!

    His fascination with “invisible forces,” no-doubt gave birth to his concept of Deity as a mad scientist, the SUPER in supernatural! To Einstein, God hides in the least expected places, waiting to jump out and shout, BOO! to all those who think they’ve constructed the perfect explanation of reality that excludes ANYTHING Supernatural!

    Einstein is credited with saying, “Coincidences are God’s way of remaining anonymous!” Faith in God Indeed–with a sense of humor thrown in!

  • ARGUMENT BY SLOGAN: Argument by Slogan is a tactic popular with politicians, though it often is identified with a euphemism: “staying on message.” It is an attempt to use a repeated slogan in place of a valid argument, thereby making it seem as though an argument has been made. Slogans usually appeal to the emotions of the audience, which gives them a level of persuasion that is unmerited logically.

    What do we want? A mindless slogan.
    When do we want it? NOW

  • John 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. 18.No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

    I highly recommend to anyone the claims of Christ.

  • ARGUMENT BY BIBLICAL QUOTE: Argument by biblical quote is a tactic popular with the mindlessly religious, though it often is identified with a euphemism: “the word of god”. It is an attempt to use a repeated written phrase in place of a valid argument, thereby making it seem as though an argument has been made. Biblical quotes usually appeal to the self-righteousness of the audience, which gives them a level of persuasion that is unmerited logically.

    Hmm…that reply practically wrote itself!

  • “Thus saith the Great Slug”
    Thou shalt not quote the bible
    For if thou doest that
    Thou shalt incur the wrath of
    The Great Slug.
    The Great Slug determines what
    is deemed appropriate and what is not
    deemed appropriate.
    The Great Slug hath spoken and he
    hath spoken through
    His assistant slug, Doug.

    Hmmm…this reply is truly inspired and in fact did write itself.
    Ama-za-zing

  • “It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”

  • Way to try and make Einstein have convictions he did not have. His own words were very clear on what his “beliefs” were.
    “It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”
    Einstein was a scientist. His life’s work was to explore and journey where his science would lead him. His “big picture’ was the Universe, and how to glean some sense into how, at least, some portion of it could be explained.

ADVERTISEMENTs